«RETRIBUCIÓN EXTRAESTATUTARIA» Y «TORPE» DE UN CONSEJERO DELEGADO EN LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO, DE 24 DE OCTUBRE DE 2006.

Abstract

The Supreme Court's ruling of 24 October 2006 addresses the grounds for the invalidity of a «portfolio commission» granted to a CEO by a resolution of his company's board of directors, which was declared null in the ruling of first instance and in the ruling on appeal, because such a commission does not appear in the company's bylaws. The authors' opinion on the nullity or otherwise of the commission is the object of this commentary on said ruling.